Eklund: Preds Streak Ends. Rangers soar, ansd MANY Changes in Playoff Projections. Out wesrtttrrre

you were 3-11, not 8-6. A OT win when you chose the team to win in regulation is a loss. Try telling a bookie or sports book otherwise. You'd get beaten and have your money taken. Stop lying and post the true results.

Today @ 1:34 AM ET
ALL OF TODAY'S PICKS
number represents how many points the team is projected to get tonight


FLA 2 NYI 1 Wrong
MTL 0 PHI 2 Wrong
OTT 0 CHI 2 Wrong
PIT 2 CBJ 0 Wrong
TOR 2 WSH 0 Right
CAR 2 DET 1 Wrong
MIN 2 SJ 1 Wrong
STL 2 CGY 0 Right
WPG 2 LV 0 Wrong
COL 2 NYR 0 Wrong
EDM 2 LAK 0 Right
ARZ 2 NSH 1 Wrong
SEA 0 ANA 2 Wrong
VAN 2 DAL 0 Wrong

3-11 daily
43-80 Total

You were 7-7 last night. Not 8-6. This is becoming a total farce now. Let's just get back to rumours.

Pretty sure Ek picked the Rangers to win the President's Trophy last summer. At the time, I thought he was nuts. Good to see the Buzztron 5000 now agrees with him.

My wife loves the buzztron 5000

You were 7-7 last night. Not 8-6. This is becoming a total farce now. Let's just get back to rumours.
- HockeyBuzzed

I just checked and got 7-7, as well. One game went to OT, with the Rangers winning, but he had the Rangers losing, so I hope that he isn't counting that as an accurate prediction.

[quote=Osprey]

Yes we can all see he went 7-7. At this point, his record now overstates his wins by 1 and understates his losses by 3. And despite this, the overall record is pretty embarrassing.

is my math wrong, or does Edmonton only get to play 81 games this season according to your buzztron

No overtime, Wrong.

43-81

Sad thing is, is you'd have a tolerable record if you just picked winners vs losers. Stop with the OT predictions and you might get a little more respect for this whole stupid thing.

Every year someone calls you out for it, but you never change it. Give your head a shake.

Go to Vegas, go to the sports book maker @ the MGM. Tell him you want to place a bet on Team A winning in OT, then go try and collect when the team won in regulation and see what they say.Or if team B won in a shootout instead. You don't get it right for predicting OT or for the right team in the wrong period of times.

You have suggested this as a bookmaker a couple times, act like it as well. A win is a win is a win. Not a partial win is a win.

Sad thing is, is you'd have a tolerable record if you just picked winners vs losers. Stop with the OT predictions and you might get a little more respect for this whole stupid thing.

Every year someone calls you out for it, but you never change it. Give your head a shake.

Go to Vegas, go to the sports book maker @ the MGM. Tell him you want to place a bet on Team A winning in OT, then go try and collect when the team won in regulation and see what they say.Or if team B won in a shootout instead. You don't get it right for predicting OT or for the right team in the wrong period of times.

You have suggested this as a bookmaker a couple times, act like it as well. A win is a win is a win. Not a partial win is a win.
- wreckage

A tolerable record for just picking moneyline winners?? What? He's at 56%. Simply picking the favourite team each game is running at about 72%. The Buzztron factors make zero sense. He had some teams finishing the year on 15-game winning streaks. He had Detroit winning 2 out of 19 games. They already won 3 with 10 more to play. He had StLouis and Minny both finishing ahead of LA. That aged well.